A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on November 20, 2014, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim B (the 19-year age), who was in a tobacco relationship in the front parking lot of the Young-gun, Young-gun, Gangwon-gun, the 40-ro Madang, went back to the road, with the victim B’s left side 7:8 times, 7-8 times, her head, her head, and her head towards the road.

At that time, the victim C (the age of 22) who was under contact with the victim B, the victim C (the age of 22) told the Defendant, and the Defendant, while taking a bath, took three times the victim C’s soften by drinking, and walking the bucks in one time by walking the bucks, thereby cutting the bucks of the victim C, and cutting it over three times.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim B, such as climatic salt, which requires approximately 10 days of medical treatment, and damaged the sinfinite which requires approximately 10 days of medical treatment to the victim C.

2. The Defendant committed violence against B and C at the time, place, as described in paragraph (1) above, and the police officers belonging to the D District Unit, who was called upon receiving a report, walked E’s Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Had's Hadd'

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, B, C, and G;

1. Application of a medical certificate, damage photographing statute;

1. Articles 257 and 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the final sentence following the aggravation of the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Probation Act: The Defendant did not agree with the victims even though he did not agree with the victims on June to August 10, 200, he/she committed the instant crime at the end, and a fine is imposed at one time around 207.