1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (B) On August 19, 2010, the Plaintiff felled in the electric shock disaster at the place of business of the (main) hybrid.

B. The Plaintiff obtained the approval of an injury or disease “breath, mathal mathal mathal, mathal mathal, mathal mathalthal mathalthal, mathalthal mathalthal mathal, mathalthal mathalthal, mathalthal mathalthal (mathal mathalthal mathal mathal),” and completed medical care on October

C. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff claimed disability benefits to the Defendant.

피고는 2012. 11. 14. 원고에 대하여 “① 흉터: [장해상태] 안면부 선상흔(5cm 미만), 노출면 두팔(25% 미만), 안면부 피부탈색(25㎠ 이상), [최종산정] 준용 14급 00호 안면부에 15cm × 3cm의 피부변색, ② 신경/정신: [장해상태] 노동능력은 있으나 신경계통의 기능 또는 정신기능의 장해에 대한 의학적 소견이 인정되는 경우 또는 두통ㆍ현기증ㆍ피로감 등의 자각증상이 의학적으로 인정되는 경우, [최종산정] 일반 14급 10호 국부에 신경증상이 남은 사람”을 이유로 장해등급 제14급 결정처분(이하 ‘이 사건 처분’이라 한다)을 하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2, 3 evidence, Eul 4-1, 2-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Since the Plaintiff’s sports scope of the Plaintiff’s assertion on the left-hand side is limited to not more than 3/4 of the scope of normal sports at 330 degrees compared to 470 degrees, it constitutes “a person who has a remaining obstacle to the function of Section 9 of Section 12 of Section 9 of Section 12.”

The Plaintiff is deemed to constitute “a person who remains with a fluorial fluor in appearance,” under class 7 Subparag. 12 of Article 7, on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff left a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoring of the part ordinarily exposed, other than those of arms and legs, where the fluoral fluor is left, where the fluoral fluoral fluor of the face is left, and where the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor of the part ordinarily exposed, other than the arms

The plaintiff is highly exposed to arms.