Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and by a fine of seven hundred thousand won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 13, 2017, Defendant A: (a) around 13:37, 201, on the ground that Defendant A was on board a bus No. 501 for E-circulating 01, and the victim B (the victim 61, 61, 00) was seated at the south-gu bus stop in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, and the head of the Defendant was knifed and knifed at the Defendant’s head, and the victim’s head was knifed, and the victim’s head was knifed with the hand knifed with the number of days of treatment.

2. The Defendant assaulted Defendant B, at the same time and place, with the face of the victim A (30 years of age, female) by putting the head of the victim A (30 years of age, female), and with the face of the hand saw.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect against the Defendants

1. A medical certificate (B);

1. Blue boxes and video CDs;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 257(1) (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty) and Article 257(1) (Selection of Penalty): Article 260(1) (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the Provisional Payment Order: Defendant B of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and Defendant B’s defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of their defense counsel asserted that the above Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate defense. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendants may be aware that the Defendants conducted a fighting with the intent of attack due to their misunderstanding and the end of the vision. In such a case, the acts of attack and defense were conducted consecutively, and the act of defense was carried out simultaneously, and the nature of the act of attack is also the same as the act of attack, and thus, it cannot be seen as constituting “political act” or “political defense.”