beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff’s document prepared by a notary public on December 21, 2012 by a will No. 668 of 2012.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s status as a party is as follows: (a) the Defendant, the South-North E, the South-North Women’s B, the South-North F, the South-North Women’s Republic of Korea F, and the North Women’s G between the deceased D (Death on March 5, 1998) and his/her child; (b) upon the request of the Seoul Family Court on August 1, 2014, the Plaintiff’s adult guardianship was commenced with the Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Ra845, August
(The above judgment was finalized on April 8, 2015). (b)
1) Each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “each of the real estates of this case”) in the separate sheet
The registration was completed under the original name of the Plaintiff, but around June 2006, the Plaintiff expressed to five South Korea each of the following subdivisions: (a) the Defendant, a South-North Korea, succeeds to the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as “second real estate”).
B) The real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “instant 1 real estate”) shall be for the next South E.
c) 1/4 of the shares and 840 Es. H’s answer in Ansan-si: c) inheritance of 18,000 of the farm, except for the real estate of this case, to Samnam-si F.
(F) Along with F’s long-term development of the said land, the Plaintiff’s share of 1/4 of the instant real estate is inherited to G and girls G, and the remainder of 1/4 of the real estate is the Plaintiff’s share (the Plaintiff appears to have been seeking to succeed to the Defendant’s share of 1/4 of the aforementioned shares, which is his share of the Plaintiff).
(2) As to this, the Defendant’s assertion that one-half or more of the Plaintiff’s assets cannot be accepted to the title-holder (F).
(3) On September 27, 2007, the Plaintiff’s property value was approximately KRW 1.6 billion, and KRW 800 million was the value of the property to be distributed to F, and the remaining children was KRW 200 million and KRW 200 million, respectively). The Plaintiff, on September 27, 2007, made a testamentary gift of KRW 1/4 of each of the instant Claim 1, to E and B, and KRW 2/4 of each of the instant Claim 1, respectively.