logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.11 2015고단1664
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in a restaurant where it is difficult to identify the name near C around Jeju-si on March 25, 2014, ordered the victim D to subcontract interior wood construction works among the construction works in Jeju-si Urban Residential Housing Construction Corporation (hereinafter “instant construction works”); and (b) the said construction site is within the land; (c) however, in the event that the design cost of the construction works falls short of the construction cost, the Defendant would be able to receive the FF loan after the commencement of the construction works, and take measures to ensure that the Defendant starts the construction works by April 15, 2014.

‘The purpose of this is’.

However, the Defendant was not the owner of the above construction site at the time, and there was no authority over the above construction site. Therefore, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party as design expenses, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to start and proceed with the instant construction project.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and took over KRW 5 million from the victim of the same day to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant E.

2. The Defendant already borrowed the instant construction project’s total amount of KRW 15 million from F, including KRW 5 million around January 15, 2014 and KRW 10 million around March 14, 2014, but did not use the said money as the design cost for the instant construction project. The Defendant promised to start the instant construction project to the victim D until April 15, 2014, but was urged by the victim due to the failure to comply with the said promise. On May 21, 2014, the Defendant, along with the Defendant, visited the Defendant at the “H architect office” located in G, which was demanded by architect I to pay the design cost from the Plaintiff, to receive some of the design cost for the instant construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction project’s construction cost and construction cost’s construction project’s construction cost is not completed through the said F.

“Alonging to the effect that it was “.......”

However, as above, the defendant is the name of design for the damaged person.

arrow