A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[200 large group 367] The defendant is a person who operated a cargo transport company for the purpose of cargo vehicle transport business, cargo article brokerage, etc., which is located in the 2nd unit C C in Jung Government-si, and the victim F is a person who tried to carry on the cargo vehicle transport business in the 2nd unit E in the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 20th unit of the 20th unit of the 20th unit of the 20th unit of the 20th unit of the 1st unit of the 20th unit of the

1. Around October 19, 2018, the Defendant against the victim F was introduced from the representative director of the JJ in charge of the dispute resolution to the above office, and the Defendant stated that “B is the operator of the cargo transport company in the state of entering into a contract with L branch and food materials transport with L branch, and that “B is the operator of the cargo transport company.” The company will take a day distance at the time of the purchase of the cargo vehicle. The above K pays to the said K a sum of KRW 8 million for the cargo vehicle cost, KRW 20 million for the cargo transport number plate, and KRW 29 million for the cargo transport number plate, and other expenses.”

However, the above L branch and Food Materials Transport Contract was terminated due to the financial situation of the company around May 2018, which the defendant operated. However, since the L branch and Food Materials Transport Contract were operated in an unstable manner only to introduce transportation articles individually to L companies, etc., the victim did not have the status of allowing the victim to carry out truck transport business even if he paid the above money and sought freight cars.

Around October 19, 2018, the Defendant enticed the victim, and caused the victim to remit 29 million won to the Mbank account under the name of K, such as the purchase price of cargo vehicles, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant had a third party receive property by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 12, 2019, the Defendant, against the Victim N, tried to sell the freight difference owned by the Victim, where the Victim lent the I Freight Number plate to the Victim.

In the process, buyer.