logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원논산지원 2019.02.14 2017가단21964
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The pertinent Plaintiff, around April 2013, contracted D Construction (hereinafter “instant Construction”). From around September 6, 2016, the Plaintiff performed the instant construction work in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun from around September 6, 2016.

From April 2015, Defendant B had been engaged in the double-wing business from around 1988. From around 2015, Defendant B operated approximately approximately 300 Gun-gun F in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do (hereinafter “instant double-wing”) and Defendant C was the mother of Defendant B, who was residing in the double-wing house.

The instant construction project is a construction project that opens a secondary line of 4.7km in length and 8m in width.

From September 6, 2016 to December 21, 2016, the Plaintiff mainly performed earth, drainage, and packing work using digging machines and brackers on the roads located in Chungcheongnam-gun E.

From October 5, 2016 to October 8, 2016, and from October 10, 2016, to October 17, 2016, to October 19, 2016, and from October 17, 2016, to November 28, 2016, and November 2, 2016;

The construction site of this case is around 6 meters away from the head of the two clubs of this case.

Upon the commencement of the construction, Defendant B filed a civil petition demanding the Plaintiff to take measures to prevent damage caused by noise, vibration, etc. from October 1, 2016.

The Defendants, on November 22, 2016, filed an application for adjudication with the Central Environmental Dispute Mediation Committee against the Plaintiff and the Assigned Group.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application for adjudication”). The Defendants reduced the amount of salary due to noise, vibration, and dust generated at the construction site of the instant application for adjudication. The Defendants suffered mental damage, such as fluorium and fluorium, and the Defendants suffered from mental damage, such as 40,250,000, mental damage, 4,000,000, 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, which was due to the damage to water supply stations, due to the damage of groundwater.

arrow