The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The cause of the instant claim was determined by the decision of recommending reconciliation on the claims against Defendant E and F stated in the attached Form.

In summary, it causes blasting and vibration exceeding the tolerance limit, and on this ground, the plaintiff filed a civil petition to the defendant who is a public official of the Ddong Office environment and the defendant several times, but the defendant did not perform necessary corrective measures and reduction measures and neglected noise and vibration intentionally, thereby hindering the plaintiff's work and causing stress diseases.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 50 million won to the plaintiff as compensation for mental damage caused by tort.

In light of each description of evidence No. 19, No. 19, No. 19, and No. 1 through No. 7, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant, who is a public official, committed the above act of abandonment by intention or gross negligence, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

The plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 19, the plaintiff lost the lawsuit against the Gu-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the full bench decided that the plaintiffs who lost the lawsuit cost should bear.

In that it is necessary to determine that the instant lawsuit was filed against an individual public official belonging to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Down-gu and that it is more strict, it is not necessary to determine the litigation cost as being borne by the individual.