beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 18 million and KRW 1.5 million to the Defendant’s Bank Account of the Defendant C, respectively.
B. On August 12, 2015, the Defendant remitted KRW 19.5 million, which was remitted, to D.
C. On August 14, 2015, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 600,00 to a bank account of C.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) concluded that the Defendant would pay 20 million won monthly interest if he/she lent 20 million won to the Plaintiff, while he/she paid her her she paid her her her her her her her her her her her her her her shed her her three months and he/she paid her her her her her she paid her her her her her her her her her her shed her her her shed her her her shed her her shed her her shed her her her her shed her her her shed her her her shed her to a bank account and lent her her she again to D on August 14, 2015.
B. In light of the following circumstances that are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, the following facts and the evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone are insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the other party who lent KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff is the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.
1) On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 200,000 among the loan details of KRW 20,000,000 to the Plaintiff’s wife, and on August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff directly delivered the Defendant, but the Plaintiff pointed out this part of the facts, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 1,50,000 to the Defendant on August 12, 2015, and transferred KRW 5,00,000 to the Plaintiff on August 14, 2015. (2) The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was a loan by deceiving the Plaintiff on August 12, 2015, and that the Plaintiff changed the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff was a loan.