logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.05.31 2018구합78633
개발부담금부과처분취소
Text

1. The imposition of development charges of KRW 102,80,820 against the Plaintiff on June 27, 2018 shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates civil engineering and construction business.

B. On November 3, 2006, the Korea National Housing Corporation obtained approval from the Minister of Construction and Transportation of the "Plan for the Implementation of Housing Site Development Projects" in the Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City B, Cdong, and Ddong E zone.

C. On November 19, 2009, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced the conversion of the said E district into the Bogeumjari Housing District pursuant to Article 48(1) of the former Special Act on the Construction of Bogeumjari Housing, Etc. (amended by Act No. 10764, May 40, 201; hereinafter the same).

Since then, the said Bogeumjari Housing District was changed to a public housing zone pursuant to Article 3 of the Addenda of the Special Act on the Construction of Public Housing (No. 12251, Jan. 14, 2014).

On May 30, 2014, the head of the Incheon Regional Headquarters of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation publicly announced the supply of the E-public housing zone land as a public housing site. On June 13, 2014, the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) purchased the instant land from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation in the amount of 44,875,350,000 square meters of the purchase price from the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G large 38,355 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”).

E. Although the Plaintiff’s accurate details are unknown, the Plaintiff, other than F, carried out a housing construction project for the instant land. The Plaintiff filed an application for approval of the housing construction project plan for the instant land under the Housing Act, and the Defendant approved the housing construction project plan on January 16, 2015.

(The approval of the housing construction project plan of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "approval of this case"), and the approved housing construction project of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "housing construction project of this case"). Accordingly, the Plaintiff was running the housing construction project of this case and obtained the authorization of completion of the housing construction project of this case on July 4, 2017.

G. The defendant is not more than the Restitution of Development Gains Act for the housing construction project of this case.

arrow