logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.03 2020고단7779
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 600,000 won.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 19, 2020, at around 22:53, the Defendant: (a) d'D' of the victim C’s operation in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) d'D' food, and (c) d'the victim requesting the calculation, who d's card, d't d't d', and d't d't d'. The Defendant obstructed the victim's restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 40 minutes; and (c) d'the victim requesting the calculation.

2. On September 19, 2020, the Defendant: (a) reported at the location of No. 112 on September 19, 2020, at the location of No. 23:00, and sent a warning that E would have to return home against the Defendant; (b) the police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, who called the Seoul Gangnam Police Station, requested the Defendant to have home; (c) and (d) performed a dangerous act, such as singinginginging off the Defendant, and (d) sent a warning that E would have to return home to the Defendant and be arrested in the act of committing a crime; and (d) sent a warning that E would have to return home to the Defendant, and (e) sent an assault by force on the part of E’s entry.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch duty of a police officer's 112 report.

3. On September 19, 2020, the Defendant, at around 23:20 on September 23:20, 202, expressed a bath to police officers working at the 169 police box located in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of drinking, such as “picker’s multi-family life,” and “spiting, spiting, and spiting on the floor,” and forced them by very rough words and actions, such as spiting, etc. on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Marsh photographs, internal photographs of the police box on the spot, and photographs of a damaged police officer;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of police officers’ ID-camp-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the field;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the duties, selection of imprisonment, and selection of punishment), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties, selection of imprisonment and punishment), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the fact that the revocation of official order and the selection of fine) concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes.

arrow