Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bus C.

On March 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above bus on March 21, 2015, and proceeded one lane from the front side of the dong apartment bus stops located in the Geumju-si, Geumju-si. The Defendant proceeded one lane from the gold village to the front side of the Geumsan High School.

Since the location is a road with a crosswalk on which a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle gets on the front door and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to safely drive the crosswalk according to the driving signal, etc., and to prevent the accident, such as safely driving the motor vehicle according to the driving signal.

Nevertheless, if the defendant neglected this and proceeded with the stop signal of the front door by negligence, he did not see the victim D(15 years of age) who gets a crosswalk from the right side of the last day of the road to the left side of the road in accordance with the pedestrian signals, and received the victim from the front side of the bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the bones, bones, face bones, etc. requiring approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black stuffs and images;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant was engaged in the operation of bus for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the crime of this case where a pedestrian scambling by violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents was committed by violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which committed the crime of this case where a pedestrian scambling in accordance with the pedestrian scam violates again signals, and the degree of injury in this case is relatively significant.