logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.26 2018가합534575
유체동산인도
Text

1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Each lease agreement between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, and joint and several guarantee agreement between the remaining Defendants, 1) The Plaintiff is the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on October 7, 2014 and November 13, 2014.

The articles listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the articles of this case”) are as follows two times between them:

The Plaintiff entered into each of the instant lease agreements with the Defendant Company with the view to receiving monthly rent from the Defendant Company, and delivered each of the instant goods to the Defendant Company. On the other hand, at the time of each of the above lease agreements, Defendant C representative director of the Defendant Company, the inside director D, and the auditor were jointly and severally guaranteed all of the Defendant Company’s obligations to the Plaintiff under each of the above lease agreements. On October 17, 2014, KRW 943,740,529, the acquisition cost of the leased goods ST-90X, and KRW 36,00,000, KRW 36,000,000, KRW 55,000, KRW 56,000, KRW 56,000, KRW 56,000, KRW 56,000, KRW 365,000, KRW 47,065,000, KRW 276,07,076,07,07,06,06,0.

3) The main contents of each of the instant lease agreements related to the instant case are as shown in attached Form 2. B. The Defendant Company’s rehabilitation procedure for the Defendant Company, including the progress of rehabilitation procedures, confirmation of the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation security right, etc., is going to the Suwon District Court on August 17, 2016.

arrow