1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff, although the defendant did not have the intent or ability to accept the plaintiff's son even if he received money from the plaintiff, the plaintiff deceivings the plaintiff according to the method such as "I wish to find the assistant officer who is known to the Cheongdae," and "I want to leave the assistant officer who is high in the Cheongdae, I must leave the highest Cheongdae, I must leave the assistant officer, and I leave the Ansan Dong-dong market, and there is a need for entertainment expenses," and received a total of KRW 43.1 million from June 2006 to April 7, 2008, and received it from the plaintiff, but the defendant did not find the plaintiff's son and received it, but since the defendant did not have the plaintiff find employment, it is argued that the defendant has a duty to pay the plaintiff the amount stated in the purport of the claim on the basis of tort or unjust enrichment, so it is insufficient to acknowledge the facts of the plaintiff's assertion, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it differently.

[Defendant was indicted by Seoul Western District Court 2013Kadan3484 as to the charge of fraud against the Plaintiff, but not guilty.] Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case was dismissed on the grounds that it is without merit.