(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.02 2015가단5025368

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.02 2015가단5025368

임대차보증금

Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KRW 32,020,466 as well as the full payment from March 11, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The Defendant’s status (1) C&A (hereinafter “SA”) promoted a reconstruction project to newly build a commercial building in the name of “G” (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) on the ground of the Flux 4,144.3 square meters in Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, where the land was located for the Gu and E, and H (hereinafter “SA”) entered into a comprehensive implementation contract with the Non-Party Cooperative to carry out all affairs related to the said reconstruction project with the Non-Party Cooperative. The instant commercial building was completed on June 4, 2010.

(2) As a member of the non-party partnership, the Defendant is the owner of the 7th floor 100 store among the instant commercial buildings (hereinafter “instant store”).

B. The Plaintiff and the non-party company entered into a lease contract between the Plaintiff and the non-party company (1) under which the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract between the non-party company, the enforcement agent of the non-party union, which is a contract for the acquisition of the right to lease the

(2) According to the lease agreement entered into by the Plaintiff, the non-party partnership, the partner partnership, and the non-party company (the non-party company) entered into a contract for the sale of the commercial building of this case between the non-party company and the non-party company (the non-party company) and the non-party company (the non-party company) to whom the contract for the sale of the commercial building of this case was made, and the non-party company (the non-party company) shall sell the divided shop of this case to the association members; the association members shall pay charges to the association; the non-party company shall lease the property to the non-party company; and the non-party company shall assume the rights and obligations to dispose of the right of lease; and the non-party company shall assume the above share of the union members and the expenses for the reconstruction of the commercial building of this case by disposing of the above right of lease).

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.16 2015가단5353315

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.08 2015가합516026

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2015가합516620

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2014가합558146

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.06 2015가합516019