logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.06.09 2016가단93238
청구이의
Text

1. The request is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, based on the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 tea38059, filed a claim attachment and collection order with the Seoul Central District Court 2016TWC as the garnishee based on the final payment order for the goods purchase price order for the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016 tea17832, and reached the Plaintiff on October 11, 2016.

On November 25, 2016, the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff for the collection of the amount of money 2016 Ghana 32930, which was based on the collection order based on the seizure and collection order of the claim, and the decision of performance recommendation became final and conclusive.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, purport of whole pleadings]

2. As alleged and determined, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that, by delivering a guaranty insurance policy for 400 million won out of the construction price for the Kenya C&C, the remainder is paid in cash and by account transfer, compulsory execution based on the final decision of performance recommendation for the claim for collection of the amount of money to be collected by the Jung-gu District Court is impermissible.

However, since there is no evidence supporting the plaintiff's assertion, the claim of this case cannot be accepted, it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow