1. The part concerning the claim for disclosure of investigation records in the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 12, 2015, the Plaintiff reported to the Goyang Police Station that “The owner stolen goods, etc. equivalent to KRW 10 million in the Plaintiff’s house” (No. 201 of Goyang-gu building B01) around 17:00.

(b) The investigation commenced by the above report (hereinafter referred to as the “instant case”).

The police officer belonging to the Goyang Police Station conducted an investigation against C, the owner of the house, and C claimed that C did not steals the plaintiff's property, and requested the second office of the Gyeonggi Police Agency to conduct a false horse detection inspection in order to clarify the authenticity of C's property.

C. On February 24, 2016, a public official in charge of the inspection for detection of false horses belonging to the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency specified C’s heart disease in the records of the instant case in the course of an interview held before the inspection, and C was inappropriate for the inspection for detection of false horses in the event of a heart disease, which is an important body part in the inspection for detection of false horses, and C decided to submit a medical certificate to the police officer in charge, and the inspection for detection of false horses was postponed at around 13:30 on March 4, 2016.

The public official in charge confirmed the diagnosis letter with respect to C received through the police officer in charge and determined that the inspection of detection of false words about C was not conducted, and only the Plaintiff was entitled to undergo a false speech detection inspection. However, the Plaintiff did not undergo a false speech detection inspection but did not undergo a false speech detection inspection while deeming that only the victim did not undergo a false speech detection inspection.

E. On April 18, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted the instant case to the Defendant to whom the instant case was forwarded by the Goyang-gu District Prosecutors’ Office 2016 type No. 9297 (hereinafter “the instant case information”).

the disclosure of this case.

F. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) pertaining to the instant information pertaining to an individual and, if disclosed, has an individual’s privacy or freedom.