A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 6, 2016, at around 02:40, the Defendant driven a 02:45 occin, which he own under the influence of alcohol 0.112% in the section of approximately 1km from the 1km to the front road of the 1719 CUocc Central Road, from August 6, 2016, the Defendant driven a bVL125 occin.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the circumstances and report on the detection of such a driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the result of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is relatively high in the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration, the fact that the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration was punished for the same kind of crime, the fact that the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration was relatively low in the risk of being punished for the same crime, while the Defendant’s use of Otoba is expected to be abolished and not driving, the Defendant’s punishment is determined by taking account of the developments and distance of driving, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, and the circumstances after the crime, and the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, etc.,