logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.13 2016가단129431
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 88,22,823 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from January 13, 2017 to February 13, 2019.

Reasons

. Results of fact inquiry into video and the same ducheon market in this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff asserted that the contract of this case was concluded and completed with the defendant. As such, the plaintiff sought payment of KRW 160,350,000,000,000 for the above construction cost (including additional tax) and KRW 33,000,000 for the additional construction cost due to an increase in the building area (including additional tax) and KRW 46,75,000,000 for the civil construction cost (including additional tax) and KRW 61,435,00,000 for the remainder after subtracting the above KRW 45,54,000,000 for the civil construction cost received from the defendant. The plaintiff's assertion 2) The defendant's assertion that the new building of this case was constructed differently from the allocation level. In light of the fact that the new building of this case was constructed partially or the retaining wall was constructed mistakenly, the construction work under the contract

* The Civil Works Corporation was included in the instant contract, did not have any further construction, and did not agree on this.

* The value-added tax was agreed not to be paid.

* The Defendant paid on behalf of the Plaintiff KRW 2,759,40 as the cost of installing the toilet for the first floor, KRW 11,653,040 as the cost of installing the material room, KRW 20 million as the cost of installing the material room, KRW 20,000 as the cost of installing the material room, KRW 20,000 as the cost of installing the material room, and KRW 30,50,000 as the cost of installing the material room, and KRW 10,000 as the cost of installing the material room.

* Following the delay in the new construction of this case, the Plaintiff incurred damages of KRW 41,280,00 for childcare fees and special activity expenses incurred from the discharge of four children from childcare centers, and childcare suspension due to the delay in completion and authorization, which amount to KRW 29,360,00 for total sales on October 2016, and KRW 7.5 million for total damages equivalent to the rent, by extending the lease period of the previous building to two months.

* Claim 100,760,000 for damages caused by non-construction or defects in accordance with the appraisal result set off against the Plaintiff’s above claim for construction payment.

(b).

arrow