logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2017.11.09 2016가합10676
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 409,968,400 as well as 6% per annum from November 30, 2016 to December 28, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs food additives wholesale and retail business, and distribution business. The Defendant is a corporation that manufactures and sells beverages, and exports and imports food beverages.

B. From April 29, 2016 to November 3, 2016, the Plaintiff directly delivered to the Defendant goods equivalent to KRW 542,750,40,00 in total, such as imported excreta, milk calcium, diesel eggs, etc.

C. In the above process, the Plaintiff’s employee sent a statement of transaction to the e-mail (D) of the Defendant’s employee, and the above E sent an order to the Plaintiff’s employee and demanded the supply of the goods.

On November 15, 2016, the Defendant paid KRW 132,782,00,000 for the total amount of KRW 30,000,00 for the goods supplied to the Plaintiff, and KRW 37,00,000 for the 25th of the same month, and KRW 37,00,000 for the same month, and KRW 132,782,00 for the goods supplied to the Plaintiff on December 28, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion supplied the Defendant with the total amount of KRW 542,750,400,000, but only received the amount of KRW 132,782,00 among them.

The defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the remaining amount of KRW 409,968,400 ( KRW 542,750,400 - KRW 132,782,00) and damages for delay.

B. Defendant’s assertion 1) The Defendant from May 2016 to F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).

F) orders made by the Defendant to make materials, such as sugar, and F, ordered by the Defendant, shall be G (hereinafter referred to as “G”).

A) The order was issued to the Plaintiff, and the delivery of the pertinent goods was conducted in the way that the Plaintiff directly delivers the goods to the Defendant. 2) Although the Defendant directly pays to the Plaintiff certain amount of goods, it is merely the payment that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff for the goods directly traded with the Plaintiff, and the total amount of the goods supplied to F for the remainder of goods.

arrow