1. As to each of the crimes in paragraphs A and A, 1, 7-a, 8, 9, and 10 to 12-e of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Based on the facts acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the court partly revised the criminal facts to the extent that it does not infringe the accused’s right to defense.

[criminal record] On January 23, 2009, Defendant A was sentenced to three years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act at the Seoul Southern District Court, etc. on November 10, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 10, 201. On June 30, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of 2,000,000 won and two years and eight months of imprisonment and became final and conclusive on November 9, 2017.

Defendant

B On March 22, 2013, sentenced on one year to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Labor, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2014.

[Criminal facts] Defendant A and B are corporations listed on KOSDAQ as mother and child relationship (hereinafter “I”).

In the future, in the case of a corporation, the name registered on the certified copy of the register of the corporation, J Co., Ltd. and K Co., Ltd., and the name registered on the certified copy of the register of the corporation is “S” or “K” for convenience.

(hereinafter referred to as “O” and “N” are referred to as “O” with respect to the business related to T Motor Vehicle when it is referred to as a company after a merger with theO on April 29, 201, when the name of the company was changed to O after the merger with the non-affiliated private M&A. In this regard, the name of the company after the merger with theO on convenience is referred to as “O” and “N” with respect to the business related to T Motor Vehicle.

O Co., Ltd. and P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter all the above companies referred to as “L affiliate”) are the actual directors of each company. Defendant B is the executive branch of the company’s funds, Defendant A operated the company by reporting the execution details and approving it. Defendant C is the representative director of Q&A as Defendant B’s dynamics.

1. Defendants A and B violate the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (Defendant A and B) due to the use of unlawful means.