logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.05 2012고정740
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the brake system as a driver of the Crane XG, the Defendant had a duty of care on July 20, 2012. On July 21:45, 2012, the Defendant: (a) from the Central Sports Park Protection Zone, at a one-lane distance from the Central Sports Park, the Defendant’s foregoing vehicle behind the Defendant’s vehicle during the signal at a one-lane distance; and (b) the fronter part of the Dracker’s stop in a stop thereafter, the Defendant’s vehicle behind the vehicle behind the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the victim E (E, South, 34 years old), who is the driver of the damaged vehicle, to receive approximately one-day treatment for about one week from the right-free kne in need of treatment; (c) the victim F (V), who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, need to give treatment for about one week; (d) the Defendant’s 34 years old tension and tension between the victim and the damaged vehicle (V).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, I and J;

1. A survey report on the actual condition and a medical certificate;

1. Some of the estimates;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (accidentbox images);

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Victims E with the largest punishment and punishment among the violations of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order against the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are admitted that the defendant faced with the fronter of the damaged vehicle, but the victims are injured.

arrow