logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단7109
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall borrow or lend any access medium, or store, deliver or distribute any access medium, while receiving, demanding or promising to receive any consideration in using or managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on April 9, 2018, the Defendant was called to the effect that “the Defendant would pay KRW 1.5 million in return for the second-time use of tax evasion account” from a person in the name of the Defendant, and agreed to lend the check to a person in the name of the Defendant and to receive money. On the same day, in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant used Kwikset’s new bank account (C) with the Defendant’s name, and sent 1.5 million won in return for the second-time use of the account.

As a result, the Defendant promised to give instructions in electronic financial transactions or to offer access media used to ensure the authenticity and accuracy of the contents of transactions with users and users.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D, E, or F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the petition, details of payment of damaged money, each commission, and each reply letter;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 49 subparag. 2 and 6 subparag. 3 subparag. 2 of the Act on Specialized Financial Transactions in the Selection of Punishment, and the Selection of a fine (it is not appropriate to commit a crime because the access media leased by the defendant was actually used for the criminal act of Bosing, but has no criminal record of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment for the defendant, and considering that the defendant reflects his/her wrongness);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow