logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.29 2016고정110
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The Defendant is the actual representative of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Company B located in Seocho-gu and employs two full-time workers.

Defendant 1 worked in the said workplace from February 17, 2010 to March 5, 2014, but did not pay 12,715,870 won of retirement allowances of retired workers D within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline.

Judgment

(a) A case for which a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim's explicit intent (proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act);

B. Withdrawal of expression of intent to punish the victim after the indictment of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)

arrow