Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months and fines for 15,000,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Defendant

A above.

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2013, Defendant C was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Gwangju District Court on April 10, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2013.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A was appointed as public prosecutor around November 15, 1995, and was in charge of the investigation from November 2006 to November 4, 2007 by the investigation division of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Macheon Branch Office”), from November 5, 2007 to June 8, 2008, from the prosecutor’s office of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor’s Office, H from November 5, 2007 to the public prosecutor’s office of the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor’s office, from June 9, 2008 to the public prosecutor’s office of the Hacheon District Public Prosecutor’s office, and were in charge of the investigation ordered by the public prosecutor, and the judicial police officer under the Criminal Procedure Act.

Defendant

C A around November 5, 2008, he/she was investigated as a fact involved in the operation of the “I” game room, a private game room, which was discovered by the police around November 5, 2008. On April 1, 2009, he/she was subject to a disposition of “suspecting” at the above Netcheon Branch Office.

2. A around March 2009, Defendant A provided C with counseling on the instant speculative game room case, and on March 12, 2009 and April 15, 2009, the Defendant provided convenience, such as computerized inquiries about the said case.

On May 1, 2009, the Defendant requested C to lend money to “the opening of Kind's house business, etc. is required” and borrowed as interest-free on May 12, 2009, the sum of KRW 40 million, including KRW 10 million on May 15, 2009, and KRW 30 million on May 15, 2009, under the pretext of offering convenience for and providing convenience in criminal cases that may arise in the future.

Therefore, by August 10, 2012, the Defendant acquired 5,960,245 won equivalent to the financial profit, and received a bribe in relation to his duties, from the Defendant, until August 10, 2012.

3. The Defendant C offered KRW 5,960,245 as a bribe to A who is a public official, as described in the foregoing paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A and C's respective legal statements 1.