1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,253,105 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 5, 2014 to February 10, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 13:40 on October 5, 2014, B: (a) CPoter II Cargo (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”)

) The driver’s driving of the vehicle and the driver’s driving of the vehicle led the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as the driver’s fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoring 103 km at a speed of 80 km at a speed of limited speed. In such a case, although the driver’s duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident by complying with the speed of restriction and prevent the accident, the driver’s fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor flu

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 7 through 9, Eul 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) the instant accident occurred without any particular visual disability factor in the direction of the progress of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident; and (b) in full view of the circumstances, the Plaintiff appears to have been negligent in making a left-hand turn from a narrow channel as wide as the width was left-hand from the narrow channel, it can be deemed that the Plaintiff was negligent, and that this was a cause for the occurrence of the instant accident or the expansion of damages.

In addition, all other circumstances have taken place during the proceedings of the instant case.