1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows.

(On the other hand, the Plaintiff submitted an application to submit a document and an application to resume pleadings on December 30, 2015 after the closing of the argument in the instant case, and argued to the effect that “the deceased died by urology, and urology falls under actual aftereffects of defoliants, and thus, the instant disposition was unlawful.” However, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the registration of the bereaved family of actual aftereffects of defoliants filed by the deceased on the ground that the deceased died by her chronic heart disease that constitutes actual aftereffects of defoliants. As long as the cause of the death of the deceased cannot be deemed as urology, the instant disposition cannot be deemed unlawful. Accordingly, this case’s disposition is accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.