beta
Text
1. The Seoul Central District Court 2013 money37155 (2013Gahap14748) against the Defendant’s Plaintiff in lieu of conciliation.
Reasons
1. The facts below the basis of facts do not conflict between the parties, or may be found in the entries in Gap evidence 1, 2, and Eul evidence 2, taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings.
On December 7, 1990, the Plaintiff and the Defendant jointly purchased the land of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and D and their ground buildings (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on each of 1/2 shares on February 8, 1991.
St. St. L. L.S.
1. The Defendant (the Plaintiff of this case) pays KRW 39,00,000 to the Plaintiff (the Defendant of this case) by October 31, 2013.
2. From August 1, 2013 to the end of each month, the Defendant shall pay KRW 750,000 to the Plaintiff as of the end of each month, but if the monthly tax amount of KRW 1/2 under the lease contract for the land and building in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, exceeds or falls short of KRW 750,000, the Defendant shall comply therewith.
3. The defendant's status of sharing of the above real estate
1.2.In the event of delay in the payment of the unpaid amount, the unpaid amount shall be paid in addition to 20% interest per annum.
B. At the time of purchase, the Plaintiff agreed to pay 1/2 of the total rent to the Defendant when leasing each of the instant real estate with the Defendant.
The plaintiff did not implement the above agreement, and the defendant filed a lawsuit claiming the agreed amount against the plaintiff as Seoul Central District Court 2013Kahap14748.
During the litigation, the above case was submitted to the conciliation (Seoul Central District Court 2013s.37155) and the protocol of decision in lieu of conciliation (hereinafter “the protocol of decision of this case”) was served on the original defendant. The contents of the protocol of decision of this case were finalized as they are.
C. The Plaintiff paid only KRW 650,00 on September 10, 2013, KRW 650,00 on October 10, 2013, KRW 650,00 on October 10, 2013, KRW 650,00 on November 26, 2013, KRW 650,00 on December 19, 2013, KRW 650,00 on January 14, 2014, KRW 650,00 on February 650, 200, KRW 650,000 on February 17, 2014, and KRW 650,00 on March 28, 2014, and did not pay the remainder, etc. properly.
Then, the defendant shall make a written decision of this case.