beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 16, 2015 to January 11, 2019 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 16, 2015, around 23:00, the Plaintiff visited the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ground C Building D, the Defendant was living in order to communicate with the Defendant as a matter of rental deposit.
나. 그런데 피고는 원고가 위 D호 앞 계단을 올라오는 것을 보고 원고의 허벅지 부위를 발로 찼고, 그로 인해 원고는 2m 아래 계단으로 넘어졌으며, 원고가 일어나 다시 계단으로 올라오자 피고는 원고를 양손으로 밀쳐 원고는 다시 계단 아래로 떨어지게 되었다.
During that process, the Plaintiff suffered injuries such as knee and kneeging debris.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Assertion and determination
A. According to the facts found above, the Plaintiff is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the tort as above, since around September 23, 2015, around September 23, 2015, the Plaintiff fell below the stairs and suffered injury to the treatment days. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the tort as above.
B. 1) The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s above harmful act caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as scarke, scarke, and tension with the injury of the Plaintiff, which was caused by the Defendant’s scarke, so the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 50 million, which is part of the Plaintiff’s damages (treatment cost of KRW 12 million, KRW 48 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million), as well as damages for delay. (2) The Defendant’s harmful act, which caused the Plaintiff’s injury to both knee and left hand, and the Plaintiff’s injury to the Plaintiff. However, each statement in subparagraphs 2 through 7 above, alone, is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Plaintiff suffered from the Defendant’s harmful act, such as scarke, scarke, scarke, anxiety, and depression disorder, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff suffered from the Defendant’s harmful act.
In addition, the above recognized medical expenses were disbursed due to the plaintiff's injury.
or the plaintiff.