logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.10 2016누66232
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "At the first instance court's 3th page 1, 2, and 6," added "at the first instance court's 3th page 5's 1, 2, and 7," and "at the third page 4 through 7, the risk of an armed armed group, such as 1 Bopis, is only a social issue, since the risks of an armed group, such as 1 Bopis, are the universal risks existing in Austria, barring any special circumstance where the armed group of Muslim, by specifying the plaintiff, was killed as a terrorism of Bopis.

It is difficult to view it as a ground for recognition of refugee under the Refugee Act solely on the ground that security is unstable due to or unslick armed forces.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and this is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow