logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2017.08.10 2017가합167
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendants jointly pay to the Plaintiff KRW 220,000,000.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208(3)1 and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Partial dismissal portion): The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants are obligated to pay damages for delay from February 6, 2017 to the date of full payment of the lease deposit. However, the obligation to return the leased object and the obligation to return the lease deposit are concurrently performed, and there is no assertion as to the fact that the Plaintiff returned the leased object to the Defendant or the Defendant extinguished the Defendant’s simultaneous performance defense right by providing the performance).

arrow