logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.12.18 2013고단1314
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On March 3, 2009, the summary order of KRW 1 million due to a fine of violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) was issued on March 3, 2009, and on January 15, 2013, from the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court to a fine of KRW 4 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License).

On August 21, 2013, at around 22:04, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car without a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.132% on the front of the Blue Motor Vehicle in front of the Blue Motor Vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. License register;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (a report on the confirmation of the same criminal records) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act was punished twice due to drunk driving and one time due to unlicensed driving, the criminal liability of the crime is not less exceptionally applied in light of the fact that he/she did not have any criminal record of suspension of execution or more, the fact that he/she did not have any criminal record of suspension of execution or more, the fact that he/she reflects it, etc., and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, etc., the punishment as ordered in

arrow