(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.10.01 2013가합8952

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.10.01 2013가합8952

공사대금

Text

1. The defendant shall pay 260,000,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from December 6, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Fact 1) On May 2, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant (joint representative: B and C) for the removal of a building structure, the main contents of which are as follows (hereinafter “instant removal contract”).

(D2) The removal period from May 2, 201 to May 30, 2011 (10 days from 10 days from 10 days from 10,000,000 won from 260,000 won from 260,000 won from 260,000 won from 20,000 won from 20,000 won from 20,000 won from 260,00 won from 20,00 won from 20

1. The plaintiff is responsible for the complete removal of the defendant's architectural structure (hereinafter "the building structure of this case") and the removal and removal of the basic columns and other remaining facilities and structures as determined by the defendant.

Article 3 [Methods of Payment of Price]

1. The Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff in cash the daily amount of KRW 100,000 (100,000) after 15 days after the commencement of the contract at the time of the commencement of the contract, and the remainder of the contract amount shall be paid in cash when the Plaintiff completed the complete completion of the work upon the expiration of the removal period.

2.The overdue interest of 12% per day shall be added to the payable amount if the payment is not made even after the lapse of the period set forth in paragraph 1.

Article 6 [Guarantee Money] The Plaintiff shall deposit 20% of the cost of removal with the Defendant as a performance guarantee, and the Defendant shall refund this amount to the Plaintiff at the same time as the payment of the balance is made.

However, when the plaintiff fails to perform the construction works or when there is a defect in the construction works, the defendant may apply the warranty bond to compensate for the damage when the relevant damage occurs.

Article 8 [Disposal of Vehicles]

1. The Plaintiff shall require a person who holds a qualification certificate for waste treatment to destroy the by-products generated from removal so that the Defendant does not create any dispute from the administrative agency.

2. The Plaintiff must compensate the Defendant for the damage incurred by the Defendant on the ground of Paragraph 1.

3. The Plaintiff’s work is completed to ensure that all wastes and remainders of the building are not generated after removal.

유사 판례

-광주고등법원(전주) 2015.06.18 2014나3394

-의정부지방법원 2018.06.20 2017가단104316

-의정부지방법원 2018.06.20 2016가단28408

-대전지방법원천안지원 2015.12.01 2014가합3507

-전주지방법원 2016.10.12 2016가합225