logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.09 2018고단512
부정경쟁방지및영업비밀보호에관한법률위반(영업비밀누설등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above sentence for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive shall be respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The victim corporation was established around October 1992 and used in the production of various kinds of nuclear teams in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-do, and thereby, manufactured and sold showers and other products, such as Ro-ri sets. From December 2010 to March 25, 2010, Defendant A took overall control of the areas of business, such as the sale of products, while working as the victim company's business team leader, and retired around March 25, 2016. Defendant B was in charge of business, such as the sale of products, while working as the victim company's business team agent from November 201, but retired around March 25, 2016.

In accordance with the rules of employment of the victim company, a member shall not maintain confidentiality which comes to his/her knowledge in the course of performing his/her duties and shall not divulge

No person shall divulge documents (including electronic documents) to the outside or peruse or deliver them to any third person without permission, or receive donations or return, or receive money or valuables from a person having a transaction with the company in connection with his/her duties.

A member shall, when he/she intends to bring in or take out the company or personal goods, undergo the prescribed procedures prescribed by the company, and shall not leak the company's important information assets (such as drawings and transaction information) or goods without permission by the rules of service.

No controlled area may be without permission of the company.

The telephone number, drawing, manufacturing technology, price list, etc. of the purchasing place shall not be absolutely leaked to the outside of business secrets.

The contents, such as “in-house difficulties shall be prohibited due to the risk of divulging business secrets,” shall be provided from time to time by prescribing the contents of “in-house difficulties,” and the Defendants shall not engage in the same type of business by collectively withdrawing from the company upon agreement with its employees around March 11, 2016, when the victim company was in office.

(State) will not be operated for three years after the same type of business as 00, the employment of the same company, or the retirement.

“As the contract was written,” the victim company’s trade secrets.

arrow