The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of and reflect against the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s health is not good; (c) the Defendant’s game room was considerably large in size and did not short of the period of the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s private game room, such as the instant game room, which was operated by the Defendant, was seriously detrimental to society, such as causing home blasting by placing the general public into the cruel game; (b) the Defendant has a history of criminal punishment several times; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had had the history of being punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) other various circumstances, such as the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, it cannot be said that the sentencing of the lower court is excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.