logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.25 2015고단2017
향토예비군설치법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2015 Highest 2017,” was the homeland reserve forces to which the three hot spring stands;

1. Around 10:00 on June 11, 2014, a notice of a call-up for training was delivered to the fourth unit of the 7508 Army on June 26, 2014, “12-year Winter Training 7th supplementary 8 hours” and was rejected without justifiable grounds.

2. On September 3, 2014, around 16:30 on September 3, 2014, a notice of a call-up for training was delivered to the fourth unit of the 7508 Army on September 19, 2014, and was rejected without justifiable grounds.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 2201" is the homeland reserve forces to which the three hot spring complexes belong.

On March 11, 2015, the Defendant, at around 10:31, confirmed the training schedule publicly announced on the website of the Internet reserve forces, and applied for nationwide reserve forces training conducted on March 20, 2015 at the three units of the Army No. 8358, but failed to participate in the training without justifiable grounds.

"2015 Highest 2369"

1. On November 6, 2014, the Defendant, at around 10:30, requested that “six hours for the fourth supplementary training for the entire 13-year period,” which was conducted by the third unit of the 8358 Army at the Army on November 19, 2014, was unable to participate in the above training without justifiable grounds.

2. On November 6, 2014, the Defendant, at around 10:32, filed an application to “six hours for the third supplementary training for the 13-year long-term continuing courses” with the third unit of the 8358 Army at the Army on November 17, 2014, which was conducted by the third unit of the 8358 Army. However, the Defendant was not present in the above training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each accusation, accusation report, receipt of a notice of a training call, a written statement of the sender of the notice of a training call, Internet training application status, commander's confirmation, organization card of the reserve forces, and detailed investigation into nationwide training units;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow