logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.18 2016노3070
사기
Text

Defendant

All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against Defendant A (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too heavy or unreasonable, and the rest of the Defendants (Defendant B: one year and ten months of imprisonment; and Defendant C: five months of imprisonment; two years of suspension of execution of a community service order; 80 hours of a community service order; Defendant G, and H: 1 year of a prison term; two years of a suspension of execution of a community service order; 2 years of a community service order; 80 hours of a community service order; and 1: four months of a prison term) are too unfair.

2. The Defendants: (a) planned the crime in advance to commit the crime of this case in an organized manner, such as that multiple persons shared and executed the crime under the conspiracy; (b) participated in false gambling against many unspecified victims; and (c) attempted to obtain money from the victims by deceiving the victims by deceiving them; (c) multiple victims have occurred due to the crime of this case; (d) the degree of damage was considerably significant; (e) the damage was not properly recovered; (e) the victims have failed to agree with the victims; (b) Defendant A was the general manager responsible for leading the accomplices while leading the whole crime; and (c) Defendant I committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime.

On the other hand, the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendants were committed both, and there is no record of punishment for the same crime except Defendant I, are favorable.

In addition, the above Defendants D, E, F, G, and H appear to have been a mere participant rather than directly receiving criminal benefits, and Defendant G and H’s participation period is relatively relatively less than the other Defendants. In addition, there are extenuating circumstances regarding the background or degree of participation, including Defendant D, E, F, G, and H, and there are also favorable circumstances, such as the first offender.

another.

arrow