A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months at the Changwon District Court for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015.

On April 2013, there has been disputes with the victim on the ground that the victim C did not transfer to the defendant a singing room entrusted by the victim C, etc. in the Philippines.

On April 28, 2013, the Defendant used a mobile phone at around 16:59 at an insular location, thereby suffering from a large number of pains on the part of the Defendant.

No matter how to help width, is the same as that of the other.

The end of this year is laved with the flag of the Gu.

All E-gus can not help them.

B. It is flicking about widths.

This is the last compromise.

“Along with the transmission of the text message “,” the victim sent the text message at a total of six times before and after that time using the mobile phone in the same way as the table of the crime committed in the attached Form, and repeatedly sent the text message to the victim that arouses fear or apprehension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A copy of the DHL transport note and each text message;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation reports;

1. Article 74(1)3 and Article 44-7(1)3 of the former Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (Amended by Act No. 12681, May 28, 2014) concerning criminal facts

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The defendant's assertion and judgment on the suspended execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant did not transmit text messages written in the crime sight table to the victim.

The same shall apply to the transmission by a third party of Mamado using the phone number of the defendant.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence as seen earlier.