The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, confiscation, additional collection of twenty five million won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the confession of the crime of this case and the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware that he had been sentenced to 2 years of probation on November 5, 2009 due to the crime of arranging commercial sex acts in the Daegu District Court, Kimcheon Branch of Kimcheon, which committed the crime of this case. The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware that he had been sentenced to 2 years of probation on November 5, 2009. When operating the commercial sex acts for a considerable period of time, it seems that the advertisement of the commercial sex acts for many and unspecified persons is poor, and the defendant made a statement that he would have earned a net profit of 500,000 won per month except for monthly rent, etc. (Investigation record 198, 199). The collection pursuant to Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. of Commercial sex Acts, which aims to deprive the defendant's unlawful profits by the act of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.