1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The assertion and judgment

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 2006. 4. 5.경 미장원을 운영하는 피고로부터 불법적인 눈썹 문신수술을 받았는데 문신이 잘못되어 다시 피고로부터 눈썹 문신제거 시술을 받았고, 이로 인하여 눈썹 부위에 가려움과 벌겋게 부어오르는 등의 증상이 있어 C의원에서 진료를 받고, D피부과의원에서 문신제거를 하였다.

After that, for the treatment of care for learning, the E-Duty Institute removed the letter and continued to use the skin for 5 years and 6 months.

As a result, there have been side effects of skin drugs, such as the outbreak of heart disease, target spawn, air circulation, and nephy in early October 201, around June 1, 201, the pressure frame Nos. 1, 3, and 4 of the 201, and after early October 201, there have been side effects on skin drugs, and even now, the symptoms of fear continue to exist, and the eyebrow left.

Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages of KRW 8,409,280 for medical expenses incurred by the aforementioned unlawful act (which does not apply for the modification of the purport of the claim in accordance with the aforementioned revised medical expenses claim) and KRW 10 million for consolation money.

B. First of all, around 2006, the defendant recognized the fact that the defendant performed the Plaintiff’s eyebrow surgery on the Plaintiff’s eyebrow, but all of the fact that the defendant performed the gate surgery and performed the gate removal surgery is denied.

According to the fact-finding results on Gap evidence 1-1, Gap evidence 2, and 7, the Furgicalians of this court, and Eul's respectively, the plaintiff did not receive medical treatment at the imposed hospital during the period from January 1, 2005 to April 5, 2006. From April 3, 2006, the plaintiff received medical treatment on the ground of after-curging care in C, 95 times from June 30, 2006 to September 23, 201, 95 times from August 13, 2013 to August 13, 2013 to June 13, 2014, the plaintiff received medical treatment from the Furgaryians of the plaintiff's eyebrow to the plaintiff's eyebrow, the plaintiff received medical treatment on the part of the plaintiff's eye and the symptoms of this product, and the plaintiff received treatment from the 5th of the above curgicians to remove the symptoms.