logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2018.07.11 2017나58574
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: ① The court's explanation of this case is ① the additional evidence submitted by this court and rejected the results of each fact-finding on the AE, the law firm number and the AF Joint Law Office of this court which lack to recognize the plaintiff's assertion as a legal personality; ② the court's determination of the first instance is as stated in the reasons for the first instance court's judgment, except for the following:

Part 3 sets aside " March 25, 2008" as " December 24, 2008."

Part 3, Chapters 12 through 17, "..................................

2) On May 13, 2015, the director of the tax office of North Busan District under the Plaintiff-affiliated District Tax Office deemed the embezzlement of the above Paragraph 1 as bonus income from H’s H’s bonus income, and imposed an additional tax of KRW 1,647,919,70 on May 13, 2015 (On the other hand, the director of the tax office of North Busan District District Tax Office imposed an additional tax of KRW 15,710,47,980 on I as to March 2, 2016. However, the said disposition was revoked later.

(1) Meanwhile, on September 1, 2013, the director of the Seosan Tax Office under the Plaintiff’s jurisdiction imposed KRW 141,750,000 on J on the ground of donation of KRW 500,000,000 on the IJ, and designated I as a joint and several taxpayer of the gift tax (hereinafter “I”), and notified I of the imposition of global income tax and the notice of designation of joint and several taxpayers for the year 2009, respectively.

2) The part of the 5th page 18 to 21 and the part of the 7th page 8 to 10 is deleted.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of reason. The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of reason. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow