1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a modification or addition of the following. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 420

2. From the fourth side of the modified and added part, it is difficult for the Defendant to accept the alteration of the structure itself of the store at the request of the Plaintiff and H that entered into a nominal lease agreement to gain profit on the premium, and there is no circumstance to deem that it would be helpful to increase the Defendants’ profit from the rent, such as that the combined deposit and rent in the instant store and No. 1 are higher than the deposit and rent in the case of lease in two separate stores, and there is no circumstance to deem that the Plaintiff and H, etc. were to bear the construction cost of the above structural modification, so it is difficult for the Defendants to find the said request even at the expense of the construction cost, so it is difficult for the Defendants to accept the said request, and that it is insufficient to recognize it solely with the statement of No. 20, as stated in the evidence No. 20.

At the bottom of the 5th place, the first place was 1, and thereafter, the Plaintiff’s act of arranging the instant commercial building itself was impossible due to the lack of a separate or specific fact, added.

7 After the 9th sentence sentence, the following shall be added:

Inasmuch as the requirements for “from three months before the expiration of the lease term to the expiration of the lease term,” the Defendants do not conclude that the Defendants interfere with the collection of premiums due to the absence of distinguishing between the instant store and the I (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 2006).

In addition, where the lease contract is terminated as it is impossible for the lessor to perform as an act interfering with the lessor, the lessee shall use the leased object for a reasonable period of time for the creation of another object on behalf of the lessee, unless there are other special circumstances.