The defendant paid KRW 589,133,084 to the plaintiff and its related 5% per annum from November 9, 2017 to February 5, 2021.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The recognition of the facts 1) C driving a D cab (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 13:50 on November 9, 2017, and driving it on the opposite lane along the center line while driving it on the side of the Hancheon-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, which is located in the fourth-ro 761, China.

The front part of the E-si was shocked with the front part of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”). 2) The Plaintiff, a passenger of the Defendant vehicle due to the instant accident, sustained the injury, such as the alley of the bridge.

3) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for Defendant vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 5, 8, and 9 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) or images; the F hospital head of this Court; the director of Seoul University Hospital; the director of the branch hospital of the branch hospital of the Seoul National University; the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the director of the branch hospital of the Seoul National University; the purport of the entire pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the Plaintiff was injured by the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident.

(c)

The Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s mother were getting on the back seat of the taxi. However, G was on the border, such as the two strings, while the Plaintiff was damaged by the two strings, etc., the Plaintiff appears to have not sold the safety level, and thus, the Defendant’s liability should be limited.

However, the circumstance asserted by the Defendant alone that the Plaintiff did not sell the safety labelling boat.

In short, there is insufficient recognition, and otherwise, the Plaintiff’s fault regarding the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident.

There is no data to be determined by the person.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

2. The Plaintiff’s damages within the scope of liability for damages are as follows:

A period for the convenience of calculation shall be monthly.