A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special robbery, rape, etc.) at the Seoul High Court around November 26, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 3, 2013.

1. The Defendant’s fraud against the victim C was using the “E” beauty room operated by the victim C in Suwon-si from July 2013, and around October 21, 2013, the Defendant sold the used car to the victim from around December 21, 2013 and repaid to the victim KRW 10 million.

“.......”

However, the facts are that the Defendant is obliged to pay approximately KRW 80,000,000,000 without any particular property or income, and only interest, etc. is required to pay approximately KRW 6,50,000 per month. However, as the Defendant was planning to use the money received from the injured party for an illegal sports gambling, there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a new card in the name of the victim from the victim, that is, from around 21th of the same month to around 26th of the same month, by delivering the said new card with the said new card. From around 21th of the same month to around 26th of the same month, 4,900,000 won were withdrawn from the new bank account in the name of the victim and taken over on five occasions from the new bank account in the name of the victim. From around 21 October 201, 2013 to January 7, 2014, the Defendant, as described in the list of crimes in the foregoing beauty room, deceiving the victim three times over three times as in the list of crimes in the attached Table, thereby deceiving the victim, and took 31,80,000,000 won in total by receiving the credit card in the name

2. The Defendant, along with C around January 2014, 2014, expressed that the Defendant, who was the victim corporation, was aware of the fraud on the Liwon Land, and that C, through the Defendant, intended to acquire the loan by means of buying the loan, without purchasing the G-owned G-owned car owned by the Defendant, which is a punishment of the Defendant, through the Defendant.

2.3.