1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff is a company which performs the duty of appraisal and assessment of movable property, real estate, and other property. The Defendant is a regional housing association established by the residents of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for the purpose of acquiring housing.

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. On May 20, 2009, the Plaintiff received a copy of the written request for appraisal on May 20, 2009 from the Defendant, by facsimile, and received a request for appraisal of the land outside Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

B. A copy of the written request for appraisal (Evidence 3) is written in the name of "Seoul Metropolitan City C service number," "the owner (holder) of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City 702-2, "Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd.," "purchase" of the appraisal report, "Seoul Metropolitan City D2 stories, A regional housing association, E", "the date of preparation", and the name seal of the representative of the defendant association is affixed to the defendant association. In light of these contents, the defendant's request for appraisal should be deemed to have been made to the plaintiff.

C. Upon the Defendant’s request for appraisal, the Plaintiff granted the receipt number 09052-22-01-009, and completed an on-site investigation and completed the appraisal, and then sent two copies of the appraisal report to the Defendant by mail.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 128,761,60,00 for the service cost of the said appraisal business.

3. Determination

A. Determination as to the admissibility of evidence of Gap evidence 3 (Co., Ltd.) 1) The submission of the document shall be made into the original (Article 355 of the Civil Procedure Act). Since the submission of evidence by a simple copy, not the original, is inappropriate in principle as the accuracy guarantee is not guaranteed, there is an objection against the other party as to the existence of the original and the authenticity of the original establishment, and the copy is used as a substitute for the original.