Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a leisure car.

At around 02:40 on June 24, 2012, the Defendant continued to cross-section the Young-gu Young-gu, Young-gu, U.S.E. Young-gu, U.S., at about 20km from the side of the Korean hospital at a speed of about 20km.

Since it is a private-distance intersection where signal lights are installed at that time, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely according to traffic signals.

Nevertheless, even if the defendant neglected this and did not have the left turn signal, he was driven by the victim D (the age of 15) who violated the signal while entering the intersection and leaving the left by negligence in violation of the signal, and was driven by the victim D (the age of 15).

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D by his occupational negligence, such as internal walls that require approximately 6 weeks of treatment to the victim F (the 15-year-old passenger), by causing damage to the diversous pressure pressure that requires multiple treatment for about 12 weeks, by the victim G (the 31-year-old passenger), who is the Defendant’s vehicle, the victim G (the 31-year-old passenger), in need of approximately 4 weeks of treatment, and by causing approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the same victim H (the 27-year-old passenger), and by causing the injury to the divers of the pel part of the pel part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Photographs, etc. of an accident site;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act does not appear to have been agreed with the victim D, F, but the victim D also seems to have been negligent in the instant accident, and the victim G and H are desired.