logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2016.11.30 2014가단7636
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 19,886,975 to Plaintiff A; KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On April 24, 2014, around 14:47, Plaintiff A, who was a gold wall at the time of Gongju, was straightened from the right angle to the right angle of the e-motor vehicle in accordance with the e-mail signals boarding the e-mail at the e-mail slope of life science of 317 and the e-mail at the e-mail (hereinafter “Defendant A”), and in violation of the e-mail signal without turn to the left at the right angle from the right edge to the right edge of the e-mail (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as pressure pressure, etc., due to this.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with F and the defendant vehicle.

Plaintiff

B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are children of Plaintiff A.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1 to 3, Eul 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, since the Defendant’s driver caused the instant accident by negligence in violation of the signal, the Defendant, the insurer, is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident.

C. 1) The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff neglected the duty of front-time care, and that the negligence contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident, and thus, the Defendant’s liability should be limited only to the Plaintiff’s fault ratio. 2) The driver of a vehicle driving along an intersection signal where traffic is controlled by signal, etc., is sufficient to ensure that other vehicles are believed to comply with traffic regulations and to take appropriate measures to avoid collision, barring special circumstances, and there is no duty of care to take special measures to prevent the occurrence of the accident in advance by predicting that other vehicles violate the traffic regulations and driving their course when they are expected to go beyond their own course, or when they are expected to go through, their own vehicles.

However, the driver of a vehicle who is driving in compliance with the signal is also the driver.

arrow