logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.05.19 2014가단15463
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff KRW 11,393,328, and as to the Plaintiff

A. Defendant B shall start on August 28, 2014, and B.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties; or (b) the statements in Gap 1 to 8 (including paper numbers); and (c) the testimony of the witness C, as a whole, the purport of the entire pleadings:

On February 14, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) between F and F, the owner of the multi-family house on the third floor E on the ground (hereinafter “multi-family house in this case”) in the name of Defendant B, a licensed real estate agent engaging in the real estate brokerage business in the name of “D”), with respect to KRW 201 (hereinafter “instant house”) out of the multi-family house in this case, and paid KRW 70 million from March 4, 2013 to March 3, 2015, and KRW 50 million from March 3, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and paid KRW 70 million to F.

(Plaintiff completed a move-in report with the instant house on February 14, 2013, and obtained a fixed date in the instant lease contract (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

At the time of the instant lease agreement, Defendant B explained that the instant multi-family house had priority over 284 million won, including the maximum debt amount of KRW 260 million, KRW 24 million, and KRW 200 million, and provided it to the Plaintiff by stating that “the matters of rights other than ownership,” in the column for confirmation and explanatory statement of the object of brokerage, “the maximum claim amount of KRW 284,000,000,000, and the National Agricultural Cooperative in Busan Special Metropolitan City, Busan Special Metropolitan City, the mortgagee of the instant multi-family house,” but the current status and legal relationship of the lessee who resides in the instant multi-family house, did not properly explain the same to the Plaintiff without undergoing a separate procedure for confirmation.” The phrase “the rights of the object of confirmation and explanatory statement of the object of brokerage, which was delivered to the Plaintiff,” is also a column for the column for “the rights.”

C. The maximum amount of debt to the instant multi-family house at the time of the instant lease agreement.

arrow