1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant D’s KRW 62,710,00 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from January 21, 2013 to May 27, 2014.

1. The telephone financial fraud scheme presumed to have a base for the facts in China is composed of several unspecified victims, such as incentives to receive money from a large number of victims by misrepresenting their government agencies, financial institutions, etc., the total liability ordering withdrawals, remittances, and solicitation of passbooks by misrepresenting them, withdrawals by withdrawing the amount of damage deposited in the large passbook according to the instructions of the total liability, withdrawals by withdrawing the amount of damage deposited in the large passbook, collections by delivering it to the officers of the telephone financial fraud group, and collections and deliverys by soliciting and delivering the large passbook to be used for committing the crime, and is operated in the form of an organization in preparation for arrest.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendants, along with the proposal of the Telecommunications Financial Fraud Group E (one-name F Office chief), deposited the amount of damage by being delivered with a large passbook, cash card, security card, etc. from the officers of the above Telecommunications Financial Fraud Group, and was given approximately KRW 9.00,000 from the head of the above F Office in return for the withdrawal of the amount of damage.

On January 21, 2013, by posting a phone call to the Plaintiff at a non-place on January 10, 2013, the instant telephone financial fraud group’s name: (a) had the Plaintiff enter the Plaintiff’s financial information on the Internet website in which the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’ Office’s website is the Seoul Dong District Prosecutors’ Office G prosecutor; (b) had the gambling website use the name of the party by stealing the name of the party; (c) had the Plaintiff enter the Plaintiff’s financial information on the website in which the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office’ Office’ Office’s website is most recent office’s website; and (d) transferred KRW 62,710,000 from the said Internet banking electronic computer manipulation via the said financial information to the 111 account, including the agricultural bank account in the name of H.

(2) The Defendants withdrawn KRW 5,990,00,00, which was transferred to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of H, and delivered to the above head of the FF office). 2. According to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C, barring any special circumstance, Defendant C shall be subject to the foregoing recognition.