logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.11 2016노2215
무고
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, but the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts for the following reasons.

A. As to Article 1 of the facts charged, C did not report the Defendant’s report on the following grounds: (a) on November 201, 201, at the two risk of 3,000 prime trees in the land as indicated in the facts charged, C engaged in flating operations on the land as indicated in the facts charged; and (b) at the time, the Defendant also resisted against

B. As to Article 2 of the facts charged, as C opened a road on the land indicated in the facts charged around February 201, 201, the Defendant’s petition is not a false petition.

(c)

As to the facts charged No. 3, C brought the Defendant’s luminous life in around March 2012, 2012, and the Defendant demanded a return of this, but did not receive a return, so the Defendant’s report is not a false report.

(d)

As to Article 4 of the facts charged, C does not have to bring a weapon as stated in the facts charged, and there is no entry that C permits the defendant to bring a weapon. Thus, the defendant's report is not a false report.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court and the first instance court as to Article 1 of the facts charged, namely, that C did not grow at all at the risk of two trees on the land indicated in the facts charged at the investigative agency and the lower court.

The defendant made a statement (as of 99 pages of the trial record), the defendant made a statement at the site and made a request to M as a worker at the time of the construction to lower the road to the site, and there was no fact of receiving a claim from the defendant due to the above construction (as of 101 pages of the trial record), 2 At the time, he was a worker at the time.

At the time of Mdo, the defendant cut the land by cutting the land and requested by the defendant to lower the path, and the construction work is done.

arrow